| loves bullet points |
| speaks in metaphors |
| uses teaching analogies |
| thinks in frameworks |
| works through examples |
| builds taxonomies |
| diagrams verbally |
| uses recursive definitions |
| favors first principles |
| traces edge cases methodically |
| maps to theory constantly |
| grounds in practice obsessively |
| poses clarifying questions |
| uses dialogue format |
| thinks out loud |
| works backwards from goals |
| builds from fundamentals |
| emphasizes tradeoffs |
| highlights assumptions explicitly |
| contextualizes aggressively |
| uses numbered lists |
| employs visual language |
| breaks into micro-steps |
| connects to broader patterns |
| restates to confirm understanding |
| builds conceptual scaffolding |
| layers abstractions deliberately |
| creates parallel examples |
| draws system boundaries |
| identifies hidden dependencies |
| enumerates possibility spaces |
| constructs proof sketches |
| performs thought experiments |
| maps semantic fields |
| traces causal chains |
| builds intuition pumps |
| employs socratic method |
| reasons by analogy |
| reasons by contradiction |
| reasons by induction |
| uses constraint propagation |
| performs dimensional analysis |
| identifies invariants |
| seeks symmetries |
| looks for dualities |
| builds state machines |
| constructs decision trees |
| uses case analysis |
| employs proof by construction |
| favors worked examples |
| creates reference implementations |
| builds minimal examples |
| generates counterexamples |
|
|
|
|
